Do these institutions fill a void in post-secondary education that 4-year schools and community colleges cannot cover? That is, are they providing a much-needed service in our knowledge-based economy and our nation's endeavor of democratic uplift?
Or do these companies prey on people who are ill-equipped to succeed in college and leave them with seemingly insurmountable debt? Does their undying obligation of profit compromise the social benefit they provide? Specifically, do they exploit Pell Grants (tax-payer funded loans for students) for profit?
In my search for answers, I have come across three recent media pieces on this issue (For now, they will have to suffice until the peer-reviewed literature catches up). I think all three are illuminating and stoke the debate.
Frontline
College, Inc.
NPR: All Things Conidered
For-Profit Colleges Encouraged Fraud, Used Deceptive Marketing, GAO Reports
New York Times:
For-Profit Colleges Mislead Students, Report Finds
Through reading, hearing, and watching these pieces, the opponents' skepticism is well-outlined. For now, I tend to agree. To be fair though, we are still collecting facts. To be determined...
1 comment:
Interesting statistic:
"In 2001 the entire for-profit, postsecondary industry graduated a little more than 28,000 students with associate and bachelor's degrees in business and management, a little more than 10,000 A.A.'s and B.A.'s in the health sciences, and not a single English major." Source: http://chronicle.com/article/Can-the-Humanities-Survive-the/124222/
Post a Comment